Lansoprazole in globus pharyngeus: double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of once-daily lansoprazole in the typical globus pharyngeus patient, who presents with a normal head and neck examination and without other sinister otolaryngologic complaints. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient otolaryngology office practice. METHODS: After meeting the inclusion criteria, patients were randomized to a 3-month course of either treatment (30 mg lansoprazole daily) or placebo (lactose). All patients were given a medication diary and instructed to take the medication daily on waking. During the office visit, counseling regarding lifestyle modifications for gastroesophageal reflux disease was provided to all patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The Glasgow-Edinburgh Throat Scale questionnaire was given prior to treatment and at 1- and 3-month intervals during treatment. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled between June 2005 and December 2006. Nineteen patients were randomized to the lansoprazole treatment arm, whereas 21 were enrolled in the placebo arm. Both groups were similar with regard to age, sex, and smoking history. The globus symptom score improved an average of 6.7 of 70 points in the treatment group and 2.9 points in the placebo group. There was no clinically or statistically significant difference between the two groups at any time point. CONCLUSION: The globus pharyngeus patient who presents with a normal head and neck examination and without sinister otolaryngologic complaints does not benefit from once-daily lansoprazole therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".