Feasibility Study of a Heavy-duty Tractor - Motorized Semi-trailer Hybrid Electric Combination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">The objective of this study was to evaluate the concept of a heavy-duty tractor - motorized semi-trailer hybrid electric combination, which would have electric drive axles on the semi-trailer.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The scope of the project included an analysis of the general concept of a power-driven semi-trailer, the positioning of the concept of the heavy-duty tractor - motorized semi-trailer hybrid electric combination in the general context of the technology, and the evaluation of the applicability of the concept for different duty cycles.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">Several transport activities were analyzed to determine specific duty cycles for heavy-duty vehicles: highway line haul and regional haul, construction haul, and off-highway hauling of raw materials, such as forestry transport with Class 8 and off-highway tractor-trailer combinations.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The concept of a heavy-duty tractor - motorized semi-trailer hybrid electric combination was compared with a corresponding conventional combination (conventional tractor and semi-trailer), and with a combination of a parallel hybrid electric tractor with a conventional semi-trailer. PSAT simulations were conducted to evaluate the fuel efficiency and the influence on traction and stability was evaluated for each representative duty-cycle.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The simulation results generally predict comparable fuel efficiencies for the heavy-duty tractor - motorized semi-trailer hybrid electric combination, and the correspondent parallel hybrid electric tractor with conventional semi-trailer combination. Depending on the duty-cycle, both hybrid versions would offer substantial fuel savings when compared to the conventional tractor-semi-trailer combination, such as up to 30% for off-highway hauling of raw materials.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The analysis of traction performances showed evident gains both in tractive force and gradeability for the motorized semi-trailer. Moreover, the use of motorized axles on the semi-trailer would improve the longitudinal stability of the vehicle combination by decreasing the potential for sliding, especially in off-highway conditions.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The evaluation of the impact on greenhouse gas emissions shows that the electric motorized semi-trailer concept would offer important annual reductions for all the analyzed transport activities, with generally attractive payback periods. Exemplifying for the off-highway hauling of raw materials using off-highway vehicles, GHG emissions reduction would be up to 108 tons/year per vehicle combination, with a payback period as low as 18 months, which is explained by very important quantitative fuel savings coupled with a relatively moderate increase in vehicle purchase costs. However, for highway and regional haul, the relative increase of the semi-trailer cost by a factor of three would make the concept unattractive.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The concept of a heavy-duty tractor - motorized semi-trailer hybrid electric combination would offer the best dynamic, environmental, and economical advantages when implemented for off-highway transport of raw materials, such as forestry or mining transport, for which the relative cost increases are acceptable and payback periods are relatively short.</div></div>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".