Compliance of peripheral airways deduced from morphometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Insights into airway mechanics were sought by applying morphometric techniques to rabbit lungs fixed at several lung recoil pressures. Rabbits were treated with either nebulized carbachol followed by iv administration of carbachol or with saline solution (sham). The lungs were held at one of six values of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP; 10, 7, 4, 2, 0, and -4 cmH(2)O) while the animal was killed and formalin was circulated through the lungs. The lungs were removed and left in a bath of formalin for 24 h. Standard airway morphometric measurements were made on membranous bronchiole slices taken from representative blocks of tissue. Reductions in PEEP produced the expected reductions in lumen area in the carbachol-treated airways but not in the sham-treated airways for PEEP > 2 cmH(2)O. Sham-treated airways remained more open than expected until they collapsed into an oval shape at PEEPs between 4 and 2 cmH(2)O. The carbachol-treated airways exhibited this behavior at PEEP = -4 cmH(2)O. The smallest airways, which had relatively thicker walls, collapsed less than larger airways. We postulate that this behavior implies that peribronchial stress is greater than lumen pressure on collapse into the oval shape. Resistance to buckling increases with the thickness-to-radius ratio of the airway wall, which explains why the smallest airways are the most open. The development of epithelial folds appeared to follow the theoretical prediction of a previous study (Lambert RK, Codd SL, Alley MR, and Pack RJ. J Appl Physiol 77: 1206-1216, 1994).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".