MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2239211291 · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/150/6/199

A SEARCH FOR FAST RADIO BURSTS AT LOW FREQUENCIES WITH MURCHISON WIDEFIELD ARRAY HIGH TIME RESOLUTION IMAGING

2015· article· en· W2239211291 on OpenAlexaff
S. J. Tingay, Cathryn M. Trott, R. B. Wayth, G. Bernardi, Judd D. Bowman, F. Briggs, R. J. Cappallo, A. A. Deshpande, L. Feng, B. M. Gaensler, L. J. Greenhill, P. J. Hancock, B. J. Hazelton, M. Johnston‐Hollitt, D. L. Kaplan, C. J. Lonsdale, S. R. McWhirter, D. A. Mitchell, M. F. Morales, E. Morgan, Tara Murphy, Divya Oberoi, T. Prabu, N. Udaya Shankar, K. S. Srivani, R. Subrahmanyan, R. L. Webster, A. Williams, Christopher Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
FundersAustralian Research CouncilU.S. Air ForceVictoria UniversitySmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryAstronomy Australia LimitedVictoria University of WellingtonMinistero dello Sviluppo EconomicoCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationAustralian GovernmentCurtin University of TechnologySmithsonian InstitutionNvidiaHarvard UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsSpectral indexAstrophysicsLuminositySkyEvent (particle physics)Radio spectrumSpectral resolutionSupergiantOpticsSpectral lineStarsGalaxyAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the results of a pilot study search for fast radio bursts (FRBs) using the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) at low frequencies (139–170 MHz). We utilized MWA data obtained in a routine imaging mode from observations where the primary target was a field being studied for Epoch of Reionization detection. We formed images with 2 s time resolution and 1.28 MHz frequency resolution for 10.5 hr of observations, over 400 square degrees of the sky. We de-dispersed the dynamic spectrum in each of 372,100 resolution elements of 2 × 2 arcmin 2 , between dispersion measures of 170 and 675 pc cm −3 . Based on the event rate calculations in Trott et al., which assume a standard candle luminosity of 8 × 10 37 Js −1 , we predict that with this choice of observational parameters, the MWA should detect (∼10, ∼2, ∼0) FRBs with spectral indices corresponding to (−2, −1, 0), based on a 7 σ detection threshold. We find no FRB candidates above this threshold from our search, placing an event rate limit of above 700 Jy ms per day per sky and providing evidence against spectral indices ( ). We compare our event rate and spectral index limits with others from the literature. We briefly discuss these limits in light of recent suggestions that supergiant pulses from young neutron stars could explain FRBs. We find that such supergiant pulses would have to have much flatter spectra between 150 and 1400 MHz than have been observed from Crab giant pulses to be consistent with the FRB spectral index limit we derive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchFrench-language works237,207