<i>Coping With Calamity: Environmental Change and Peasant Response in Central China, 1736–1949</i>. By Jiayan Zhang (Vancouver, University of British Columbia Press) 276 pp. $95.00 cloth $32.95 paper
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coping with Calamity explores the causes and outcomes of environmental change in central China’s Hunan Province. Specifically, the text examines the transformative effects that human action had on the Jianghan Plain during the Qing (1644–1919) and Republican (1911–1949) periods. By exploiting an impressive range of local archival sources, Zhang skillfully illustrates how the massive re-engineering of the waterscape that rendered the Plain a critical agricultural region in China ultimately led to a breakdown of its drainage infrastructure. By the late Qing and Republic eras, farmers had creatively adopted strategies to defend against a growing set of ecological threats, but these measures served only to abet the ecological breakdown of the region. The entire set of mutually implicating economic, social, and cultural responses to environmental breakdown impels Zhang to argue, “[T]his demonstrates that environmental factors, more than class relations or market dynamics, defined the agrarian economy of the Jianghan Plain in the Qing and the Republic” (207).The book not only contributes to our understanding of the dynamics of change in China but also offers insights on agro-environmental developments in other cultural contexts. For scholars of China, the text offers an important regional study that illustrates the widely disparate environmental context of different areas in China (for example, the Jianghan Plain versus the North China Plain). Zhang also adds to a corpus of literature that has effectively characterized state control over the agricultural economy as neither pervasive nor entirely absent. This book’s emphasis on the remarkable resilience of farmers in the region impels Zhang to dispute other China scholars’ description of China’s agricultural practices in the late imperial period as largely unsustainable. In any event, Zhang’s analysis challenges any notion of a “hydraulic despotism” in this part of China. In this realm, the book will be of interest to those interested in state–society relations in irrigation societies.A particularly important contribution of Coping with Calamity is the explanatory power of the environmental approach, which sustains an array of economic, social, and cultural responses to environmental conditions—a series of events and responses that is extraordinarily effective in illustrating broad social change. According to Zhang, an environmental approach offers an analytical framework that transcends more standard explanatory paradigms. Explanations of rural change in China relied on theories of class struggle from the 1950s to the 1970s and the market school since the 1980s. Zhang forcefully argues that such paradigmatic approaches simply fail to capture the complex, mutually supporting historical dynamics that cycles of environmental change and peasant response can accommodate. In this respect, his analysis of change in rural China during the late imperial period will indeed be of interest to practitioners of interdisciplinary history.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".