HeartSaver VAD: A Totally Implantable Ventricular Assist Device. Results of In Vivo Studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Currently, the most widely utilized ventricular assist devices (VADs) require percutaneous connections and are located either externally (e.g., Thoratec, Abiomed) or intra-abdominally (e.g., Novacor, TCI). These attributes have been implicated in a variety of complications (infection, thromboembolic, gastrointestinal, etc.). To address these concerns, a totally implantable VAD that requires no percutaneous connections and can be implanted in the left hemi-thorax has been developed. The developed device has undergone in vivo evaluation as part of the design and development process. A total of 43 implants in the bovine model, with 5 device versions, have been conducted between July 1992 and February 2000. These studies successfully have demonstrated several important aspects of the developed device, including 1) feasibility of a totally implantable system; 2) capability of the device to support a dysfunctional heart; and 3) ability of the device to provide flows up to 10 L/min in a physiological setting. The studies to date have played a vital role in the design and development process as well as demonstrating the feasibility of a totally implantable intrathoracic VAD. Based on these studies, design optimization was conducted, resulting in the development of the pre-clinical version of the device in preparation for clinical trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".