MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2241407749

Study regarding the influence of the agrofield and the climatic conditions from Timisoara on raw cotton production to some cotton genotypes (Gossypium hirsutum sp.).

2014· article· en· W2241407749 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Liliana Baba, V. Tabără, Iuliana Creţescu

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Journal of Agricultural Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicResearch in Cotton Cultivation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgronomyGossypium hirsutumGenotypeRaw materialFiber cropGossypiumBiologyHorticultureEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of the present investigations was to determine the influence of agrofield on raw cotton production to three cotton genotypes (Gossypium hirsutum sp.): Marismas and Coko genotypes from Greece and Canada genotype from the USA, in the year 2010 of investigation. Investigations made to Experimental and Didactical Station of Timisoara, the experimental field being placed on a cambic chernozem soil, in climatic conditions of Timisoara in the year 2010. The experimental factors established were: Factor A - agrofield and Factor B - genotype. Factor A with six graduation: a1 - N0P0K0, a2 - N30P30K30, a3 - N60P30K30, a4 - N90P60K60, a5 - N120P60K60, a6 - N30P30K30 and agrofield fertilization. Factor B with three graduation: b1 - Canada - the USA; b2- Marismas- Greece; b3- Coko- Greece. Production analysis of raw cotton obtained under agrofield influence emphasized differences among genotypes. In the climatic conditions of Timisoara in the year 2010, the average productions of raw cotton were: Grecian genotype Marismas - 1992 kg/ha, Grecian genotype Coko - 1833 kg/ha and Canada genotype - 1857 kg/ha. The biggest production at Marismas genotype was obtained on agrofield a4 - N90P60K60 (relative 2147 kg/ha cotton production) comparative with agrofield a1 - N0P0K0. The biggest production for Canada genotype was obtained on the agrofield a4- N90P60K60 (2047 kg/ha cotton production). The biggest productions at Coko genotype was obtained on the agrofield a4 - N90P60K60 (2033 kg/ha cotton production). The obtained results were statistically processed the analysis of variance and differences at p<0.05 were considered statistically significant. The three cotton genotypes presented a good adaptability to weather conditions from Timisoara in the year 2010. The weather conditions of year 2010 determined low productions of raw cotton to all the cotton genotypes face to the ones of 2008, the entrance in vegetation of plants with a delay of approximate of 14 days, it was the dominant factor. Investigation brought a data base of valorous reference about cotton cropping in Western of Romania.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Journal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicResearch in Cotton CultivationFrench-language works237,207