Forage Yield and Nutritive Value of Turf Bermudagrasses Managed to Simulate a Horse Pasture Management Scheme in the U.S. Upper Transition Zone
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Turf‐type bermudagrasses [ Cynodon dactylon (Pers.) L.] with improved cold tolerance could have potential use in horse pastures of the U.S. Upper South for minimizing the damage to grass stands due to heavy trampling in these pastures; however, the dry matter (DM) yield potential and nutritive values of these bermudagrasses are not known. A small‐plot experiment was conducted for three growing seasons with monocultures of two turf‐type bermudagrasses (‘Yukon’ and ‘Riviera’), one forage‐type (‘Wrangler’), and four mixtures of the three (Wrangler × Yukon, Wrangler × Riviera, Yukon × Rivera, and Wrangler × Yukon × Riviera) to evaluate and compare DM yield, crude protein (CP), in vitro true digestibility (IVTD), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF). Although DM yield, averaged across seasons, for Wrangler was 31 and 40% greater than for Yukon and Riviera, yields were similar between Wrangler and Wrangler × Yukon mixture, and the three mixtures provided greater DM yields than either turf type alone. Crude protein, averaged across seasons, was similar between the turf types, and both had greater CP than Wrangler and the mixtures. Across treatments, IVTD, NDF, and ADF were similar among bermudagrass cultivars. Results of the experiment indicated that Yukon and Riviera bermudagrasses have acceptable nutritive value for horse pastures, but the Wrangler × Yukon mixture could serve as an option for heavier stocked pastures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it