MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Clinical outcome of metastatic melanoma involving the CNS with or without (w/o) intracranial hemorrhage (IHC)

2007· article· en· W2241992350 on OpenAlexaff
Tsu‐Yao Cheng, J. N. Scott, Bernhard J. Eigl, P J Corbett, Gregory McKinnon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBrain Metastases and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCraniotomyBrain metastasisMalignancySurgeryMelanomaRadiation therapyRetrospective cohort studyInternal medicineMetastasisCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

8577 Background: Melanoma has a high rate of ICH associated with CNS metastasis (mets). There is no data on the clinical outcome of these patients (pts) in the literature. Methods: A retrospective review of 52 pts with melanoma CNS mets diagnosed from 11/2001 to 09/2006 at our institution. Two pts were excluded due to a second malignancy. The clinical, radiological, and pathological characteristics of these pts were reviewed. Results: 39 pts were diagnosed after onset of neurological symptoms and 11 were diagnosed during staging. Of these, 14 (28%) were solitary, 23 (46%) were = 4, and 13 (26%) were multiple brain mets. Mean age at brain mets diagnosis was 55 years (range 24–88). Mean follow-up was 25 months (mos) (range 3–61) and 64% were male. ICH was found in 22 pts (44%) with 13 pts (26%) having frank hemorrhage on cranial CT and/or MRI scan. ICH was less common (9%) in pts with brain mets diagnosed on staging. 11 pts (8 with ICH, 3 w/o ICH) underwent CNS mets resection through craniotomy followed by whole brain radiation (WBRT) and/or stereotactic radiotherapy (STR). 7 pts received best supportive care. The remaining pts received WBRT and/or STR. The median survival (MS) for the entire group from CNS mets diagnosis was 7.6 mos. For pts with ICH, overall MS was 9.6 mos with MS of 21.2 mos for pts who underwent craniotomy vs 2.9 mos for pts w/o craniotomy. One pt refused therapy and later died from frank ICH. For pts w/o ICH, overall MS was 6.0 mos with MS of 21.3 mos for pts who underwent craniotomy vs 4.2 mos for pts w/o craniotomy. Pts who underwent craniotomy followed by WBRT and/or STR fared the best with MS of 21.2 mos. Of these, 2 pts with solitary brain mets (1 with ICH, 1 w/o ICH) were alive with no relapse at 58 and 53 mos respectively. The cause of death was disease progression in almost all pts and 85% of pts died from CNS disease progression. One pt died from post-operative complications of craniotomy. Conclusions: ICH by itself is not associated with a negative clinical outcome with appropriate clinical management. Aggressive surgical resection followed by radiotherapy in selected pts improves clinical outcome with prolonged survival possible in a minority of pts. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.213
GPT teacher head0.510
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicBrain Metastases and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207