MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Determining incidence and predictors of deep vein thrombosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

2006· article· en· W2242086095 on OpenAlexaff
David Levi, Vicky Tagalakis, V. Cohen, Jason Agulnik, Goulnar Kasymjanova, David Small

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineLung cancerDeep veinIncidence (geometry)Retrospective cohort studyConfidence intervalCohortStage (stratigraphy)CancerThrombosisChemotherapyOncologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

7159 Background: The risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been well studied. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with NSCLC to determine the incidence of DVT and characterize predictors of DVT in NSCLC patients. Methods: The pulmonary oncology database of the SMBD-Jewish General Hospital contains prospectively collected clinical data on all lung cancer patients followed in the pulmonary oncology clinic since January 1, 1997. We identified all consecutive patients with a histologically confirmed new diagnosis of NSCLC between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 2004 and determined the occurrence of an objectively defined DVT. Data on age, gender, NSCLC type and stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, exposure to surgery and chemotherapy, and death was collected and compared among patients with DVT and patients without DVT. Results: Of the 493 NSCLC patients included in the cohort for a total of 634 person-years, 67 (13.6%) patients developed an objectively confirmed DVT. We calculated an incidence rate of 110 cases (95% confidence interval (CI) 80, 130) per 1000 person-years. Risk factors associated with occurrence of DVT were advanced stage (p = 0.0006) and male sex (p = 0.04). A multivariable regression analysis adjusted for recent surgery and performance status showed that advanced stage (Rate ratio 2.55, 95% CI 1.33–4.89) and male sex (Rate ratio 1.75, 95% CI 1.03–2.94) were independent predictors of DVT. Age, type of NSCLC, and chemotherapy did not predict DVT. The risk of dying was 1.7-fold increased (Hazard Ratio 1.73, 95% CI 1.29–2.32, adjusted for age, sex, stage, surgery, performance status, and date of lung cancer diagnosis) among patients with DVT compared to patients without DVT. Conclusions: Our results show a high incidence of DVT in NSCLC patients and that advanced stage and male sex are important predictors of DVT. Moreover, NSCLC patients with DVT have a 1.7 fold increased risk of dying than patients without DVT. Confirmation of our results by prospective studies may provide the necessary evidence for targeted use of prophylactic anticoagulants in NSCLC patients to prevent development of DVT and improve related survival. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→