MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An open label phase II trial of the Plk1 inhibitor BI 2536, in patients with sensitive relapse small cell lung cancer (SCLC)

2009· article· en· W2242665894 on OpenAlex
Leena Gandhi, Quincy S. Chu, John Stephenson, Bruce E. Johnson, Ramaswamy Govindan, Philip Bonomi, Keith D. Eaton, Holger Fritsch, Gerd Munzert, Mark A. Socinski

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTolerabilityInternal medicineProgressive diseaseChemotherapyPhases of clinical researchGastroenterologyOncologySurgeryAdverse effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

8108 Background: BI 2536 is a potent, selective inhibitor of polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1), a regulator of mitotic progression. BI 2536 demonstrated favorable tolerability and antitumor activity in phase I trials. We investigated the antitumor efficacy, safety and PK of BI 2536 in patients (pts) with sensitive relapse SCLC. Methods: This open label single arm phase II study followed a Gehan two-stage design. Primary objective was to determine the antitumor efficacy of BI 2536 in SCLC pts with disease recurrence ≥60 days after completion of first-line chemotherapy. 18 pts had to complete 2 courses to be evaluable for stage 1 analysis. In case of ≥2 partial or complete antitumor responses (RECIST criteria), stage 2 accrual would continue until 40 pts were entered. Patients received 200 mg BI 2536 as a 1h i.v. infusion on Day 1 every 3 weeks. Dose escalation to 250 mg (cycle 3 onwards) was encouraged in pts with <Grade 2 drug related non-hematologic and <Grade 3 hematologic toxicity. Results: 23 pts (14 female, 9 male, 21 extensive disease, 2 limited disease), median age 60 yrs (range: 35–77) were treated. All patients had disease recurrence >60 days after completion of first-line therapy. Of 23 pts, no objective antitumor responses were observed, 7 had stable disease as best response, 14 had progression, 2 were not evaluable. A median of 2 courses were given, up to a maximum of 12 in 1 pt. The PFS rate at 3 months was 25%. Due to the lack of antitumor responses, trial accrual was terminated after stage 1. Overall, BI 2536 was well tolerated. Frequent AEs were neutropenia (48%), fatigue (39%), nausea (30%), anemia, vomiting, constipation (26% each), and thrombocytopenia (22%). Drug related grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (13%/26%), grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (1 pt each), grade 3/4 anemia (1 pt each), grade 4 sepsis (1 pt), Grade 4 ARDS (1 pt) and Grade 3 fatigue (1 pt). PK analyses indicate that BI 2536 has high clearance (>1,000 mL/min) and quickly distributes in multiple compartments in a large volume of distribution (>1,000 L). Estimated elimination half-life was >25 h. Conclusions: BI 2536 was well tolerated in relapsed SCLC pts, but demonstrated no convincing antitumor efficacy after stage I of the study. Therefore, BI 2536 will not be assessed further as a single agent in SCLC. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.526
Teacher spread0.405 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it