An open label phase II trial of the Plk1 inhibitor BI 2536, in patients with sensitive relapse small cell lung cancer (SCLC)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
8108 Background: BI 2536 is a potent, selective inhibitor of polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1), a regulator of mitotic progression. BI 2536 demonstrated favorable tolerability and antitumor activity in phase I trials. We investigated the antitumor efficacy, safety and PK of BI 2536 in patients (pts) with sensitive relapse SCLC. Methods: This open label single arm phase II study followed a Gehan two-stage design. Primary objective was to determine the antitumor efficacy of BI 2536 in SCLC pts with disease recurrence ≥60 days after completion of first-line chemotherapy. 18 pts had to complete 2 courses to be evaluable for stage 1 analysis. In case of ≥2 partial or complete antitumor responses (RECIST criteria), stage 2 accrual would continue until 40 pts were entered. Patients received 200 mg BI 2536 as a 1h i.v. infusion on Day 1 every 3 weeks. Dose escalation to 250 mg (cycle 3 onwards) was encouraged in pts with 60 days after completion of first-line therapy. Of 23 pts, no objective antitumor responses were observed, 7 had stable disease as best response, 14 had progression, 2 were not evaluable. A median of 2 courses were given, up to a maximum of 12 in 1 pt. The PFS rate at 3 months was 25%. Due to the lack of antitumor responses, trial accrual was terminated after stage 1. Overall, BI 2536 was well tolerated. Frequent AEs were neutropenia (48%), fatigue (39%), nausea (30%), anemia, vomiting, constipation (26% each), and thrombocytopenia (22%). Drug related grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (13%/26%), grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (1 pt each), grade 3/4 anemia (1 pt each), grade 4 sepsis (1 pt), Grade 4 ARDS (1 pt) and Grade 3 fatigue (1 pt). PK analyses indicate that BI 2536 has high clearance (>1,000 mL/min) and quickly distributes in multiple compartments in a large volume of distribution (>1,000 L). Estimated elimination half-life was >25 h. Conclusions: BI 2536 was well tolerated in relapsed SCLC pts, but demonstrated no convincing antitumor efficacy after stage I of the study. Therefore, BI 2536 will not be assessed further as a single agent in SCLC. [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".