MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2242744840 · doi:10.1182/blood.v106.11.277.277

Thromboprophylaxis after Orthopaedic Surgery with an Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibitor: Pooled Results of Two Phase Iib Clinical Trials.

2005· article· en· W2242744840 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander G.G. Turpie, Kenneth A. Bauer, Lars C. Borris, Ola E. Dahl, William D. Fisher, Michael Gent, Sylvia Haas, Menno V. Huisman, Ajay K. Kakkar, Peter Kälebo, Louis M. Kwong, Martin Homering, Frank Misselwitz, Bengt I. Eriksson

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreHamilton General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineClinical endpointPulmonary embolismDeep veinSurgeryClinical trialVenographyThrombosisKnee replacementData monitoring committeeRandomized controlled trialArthroplastyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Thromboembolic events, such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), are a serious risk after surgical procedures, such as major orthopaedic surgery. BAY 59-7939 is an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor in clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. The efficacy and safety of BAY 59-7939 for thromboprophylaxis have been determined relative to enoxaparin in two clinical trials, one after elective total hip replacement surgery, and one after elective total knee replacement surgery. Both trials were multicenter, multinational, double-blind, dose-ranging studies; the hip surgery trial was performed in Europe, and the knee surgery trial in North America. This pre-specified analysis combines data from both trials. Patients (n=1343) were randomized to oral BAY 59-7939 at 2.5, 5, 10, 20, or 30 mg twice daily (bid), or subcutaneous enoxaparin (40 mg once daily starting 12 hours before hip surgery, or 30 mg bid starting 12 hours after knee surgery). Treatment continued until mandatory bilateral venography was performed 5–9 days after surgery. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of DVT, PE, and all-cause mortality, and was analyzed in 914 per-protocol patients. The secondary efficacy endpoint was major venous thromboembolism (VTE) - proximal DVT, PE, and VTE-related death. The primary safety endpoint was major, post-operative bleeding, and was analyzed in 1317 patients. Observed pooled event rates are shown in the table. No significant dose-response relationship for efficacy was observed with BAY 59-7939 (P=0.39 and P=0.46 for primary and secondary endpoints, respectively) in logistic regression models using total daily dose and adjusting for study, age and gender effects; this was potentially due to the efficacy achieved with the lower BAY 59-7939 doses. A significant dose-response relationship was observed for major, post-operative bleeding with BAY 59-7939 (P<0.001). In conclusion, this analysis showed that for the prevention of VTE following major orthopaedic surgery, BAY 59-7939 has a wide therapeutic window and, at doses of 2.5 to 10 mg bid, has similar efficacy and safety to the enoxaparin regimens. BAY 59-7939 (mg bid) Endpoint 2.5 5 10 20 30 Enoxaparin DVT, PE, all-cause mortality 36/167 (21.6%) 38/166 (22.9%) 26/161 (16.1%) 38/156 (24.4%) 17/88 (19.3%) 49/176 (27.8%) Major VTE 5/167 (3.0%) 4/166 (2.4%) 5/161 (3.1%) 5/156 (3.2%) 1/88 (1.1%) 8/176 (4.5%) Major, post-operative bleeding 2/232 (0.9%) 3/238 (1.3%) 5/236 (2.1%) 9/232 (3.9%) 10/143 (7.0%) 4/236 (1.7%)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.008
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management→French-language works237,207→