MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2242825797

Pre-slaughter intervention by vaccination of cattle - new approach to reduce risk of meat contamination by foodborne pathogens, and consequently reduce incidence of human disease and economical burden*

2011· article· en· W2242825797 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dragan Rogan, Susan E. Goebel, Louisa J. Zak, M. Medellin-Pena

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEscherichia coli research studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutbreakTransmission (telecommunications)Environmental healthPopulationDiseaseLivestockFood safetyFood contaminantIncidence (geometry)MedicineFood poisoningBiologyVeterinary medicineMicrobiologyFood scienceVirology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A b s t r a c t: Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) is an important zoonotic pathogen of humans. It is a commonly found fecal coliform bacterium present in the intestine of ruminants, from where it is frequently shed into the environment. Cattle are the main reservoir of E. coli O157. Whilst causing no disease in cattle, exposure of humans to very few bacteria (10 or fewer) is responsible for major outbreaks of hemorrhagic colitis (HC) and haemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) throughout the world. The most common mode of transmission of E. coli O157 to the human population is by consumption of contaminated food, which accounts for 61% of human illness. The United States Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC; 2008) reported that consumption of beef products and produce (including fruits and vegetables) was a significant mode of transmission, accounting for 45% and 34% of food borne illnesses respectively. In addition to the foodborne mode of transmission, drinking contaminated water accounted for 15% of all cases of human illness associated with E. coli O 157. In Canada approximately 26 000 people become ill each year because of exposure to E. coli O157. Traditionally, work has focused on improving cattle meat safety through the implementation of post-harvest antimicrobial treatments. However for effective disease control in human populations, which are susceptible to E. coli O157 arising from not only contaminated beef, but contaminated produce, drinking water and direct contact, it becomes apparent that a comprehensive ‘One Health’ initiative is probably the most suitable approach to control or eliminate the amount of pathogens that enter our environment. This approach identifies and evaluates the connections between animals, human and environmental domains. The value of this approach is demonstrated by the data from CDC which estimates that three-quarters of all new and emerging diseases are zoonotic. Presently, E. coli O157, and several other enteric pathogens found in livestock including Salmonella, and Campylobacter jejuni, found in sheep, cattle swine and poultry, and Yershinia enterocolitica found in swine contribute to the estimated 79 million people in the United States that become ill after consuming food contaminated with pathogens. An on-farm vaccination strategy is one of the best methods to reduce the prevalence of E. coli O157 both within in its primary host and the general environment. The focus of this manuscript is to describe E. coli O157, the central role of cattle in disseminating E. coli O157 in the environment, and the rational for the development and implementation of an efficacious pre-harvest vaccination strategy using a fully licensed vaccine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEscherichia coli research studies→French-language works237,207→