MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2242897314 · doi:10.1117/12.2196890

A system concept for persistent, unmanned, local-area Arctic surveillance

2015· article· en· W2242897314 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bruce A. McArthur

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicOil Spill Detection and Mitigation
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceContext (archaeology)Situation awarenessArcticRemote sensingReal-time computingRadarSecondary surveillance radarComputer securityTelecommunicationsEngineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a system concept for persistent (up to 365 days, 24/7), unmanned, local-area surveillance of air and maritime surface and sub-surface objects in the Canadian Arctic. The system concept is based on unmanned, remotely controlled and monitored Arctic Surveillance Systems that could be deployed at one or more maritime chokepoints, at locations in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. The Artic Surveillance Systems would be operated over a satellite communication channel from a Southern Control Centre located in the south of Canada. Surveillance information for each detected platform and environmental reports for the local operating area would be compiled semi-automatically, from the integration of data transmitted from multiple above-water and underwater sensors and self-reporting systems, and be disseminated, in near real-time, to defence, security, and public safety clients. Potential sensors and self-reporting systems include radar, radar intercept receiver, underwater acoustic arrays, electro-optical/infrared camera system, Automatic Identification System (AIS), Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B), and a meteorological sensor system. The system concept is comprised of a surveillance concept – which includes environmental and geographic factors, platform types under potential surveillance, end-user information requirements, contributions of individual sensor types to surveillance, and the role of local-area surveillance within the broader context of Arctic Domain Awareness – and a system operating concept. The system operating concept describes the system capabilities and operating modes required to achieve the surveillance concept. Specific consideration is given to the interplay between the automation level, the quality and timeliness of the resulting information productions, the allocation of processing functions between the Control Centre and the Arctic Surveillance System, and transmitted data volumes. The system concept is being used in support of the specification of functional requirements for a concept demonstration system for Arctic surveillance, currently under development by Defence R&D Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.671
Threshold uncertainty score0.893

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicOil Spill Detection and MitigationFrench-language works237,207