MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2242977888 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22432

Chemical looping syngas from CO<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>O over manganese oxide minerals

2016· article· en· W2242977888 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Patrice Perreault, Gregory S. Patience

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSyngasChemical looping combustionCarbon monoxideManganeseHydrogenOxideCarbon dioxideChemistryHydrogen productionOxygenInorganic chemistryWater-gas shift reactionCombustionDiffusionCatalysisMaterials sciencePhysical chemistryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rather than sequestering carbon dioxide from the exhaust of chemical looping combustion reactors, together with the water, it could be used as a source of syngas. For the first time, we split water to hydrogen and carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide with a manganese ore. Specific CO production is 10–100 times higher than Sr, Ce, and Fe doped perovskites and perovskites. At a contact time of 0.01 s and at temperatures ranging from 810–960 °C the maximum specific CO production was 5.5 . A combined kinetic‐axial dispersion hydrodynamic model accounts for 97 % of the variance in the data assuming the reaction rate is first‐order in and surface reduced sites and in equilibrium with the reverse reaction—a first‐order reaction in CO with surface oxidized sites. A second reaction accounts for the diffusion of surface oxygen to the bulk lattice. Hydrogen productivity peaked at 4.8 at 947 °C, which is twice as high as reported in previous studies on and in the hercynite cycle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicChemical Looping and Thermochemical ProcessesFrench-language works237,207