MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pharmacodynamic and safety study of reolysin in patients with advanced solid tumors

2007· article· en· W2243057854 on OpenAlexaff
R. Gollamudi, Keyur Desai, Imran Chaudhary, Mohammad H. Ghalib, B. Wong, Mark H. Einstein, Matthew Coffey, George M. Gill, Sridhar Mani, Sanjay Goel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsOncolytics Biotech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChillsInternal medicinePharmacodynamicsAntibodyGastroenterologyCancerViral loadImmunologyPharmacokineticsVirologyVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

14004 Background: Reolysin is an intravenous formulation of reovirus serotype 3 - Dearing strain which is a double stranded RNA non-enveloped icosahedral virus capable of inducing cytopathic effects in cancer cells that have an activating mutation in the ras protooncogene. Pre clinical testing has identified cancer cell lines as being susceptible to reovirus infection. Methods: This was an open- label single center phase I safety and dose escalation trial of reolysin administered intravenously over 1 hour on day 0 in a 28 day cycle. Dose escalations were in half log increments. Serum for neutralizing antibody (NA) was drawn at baseline, and days (d) 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28, and serum, stool, saliva, and urine for viral shedding (by RT-PCR) were sampled on d 1,7,14,21, and 28. Response was assessed by imaging studies after 1, 3, 5, and 7 cycles. Results: 18 patients (pt); median age 57 (40–72) years; performance status 0–1; diagnoses - ovarian (6), colorectal (5), and others (7) received 27 cycles of reolysin (median 1, range 1–7) in 6 dose cohorts of 1x108, 3x108, 1x109, 3x109, 1x1010, and 3x1010 tissue culture infective dose (TCID)50. No protocol defined dose limiting toxicities were observed. Drug related grade 2 toxicities included chills (2 pt), and fatigue (3 pt). The only grade 3 event was fever in cycle 7 in a 57 year old woman with progressive breast cancer, treated at a dose of 1x1010 TCID50. She was noted to have 28.5% shrinkage in objective tumor volume. An additional 7 pt had stable disease (SD). No NA was detectable in the serum in any pt at baseline; however all pt developed NA (on d 5 in 5 pt, d 8 in 11 pt, d 14 in 1 pt, and d 28 in 1 pt) during the course of the study. Viral shedding was observed in serum - 5 pt, stool - 3 pt, saliva - 3 pt, and urine - 4 pt. Of interest, 4 of 5 pt with viral shedding had SD as their best response. However, there was no observed relationship between NA formation and SD. Conclusion: Reolysin administered as a one hour infusion on a monthly schedule is safe and well-tolerated even in multiple doses. This preliminary data suggests there is anti-tumor activity of reolysin as a single agent, and warrants further studies either alone or in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.436 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207