Alemtuzumab in clinical practice: A British Columbia experience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
8098 Background: Limited information is available on alemtuzumab in the non-clinical trial setting. We evaluated its efficacy and safety in 42 consecutive unselected patients who received alemtuzumab monotherapy in British Columbia between October 2002 and August 2006. Methods: Information on patient demographics, baseline clinical and pathologic characteristics, dose and schedule of treatment, clinical response, survival, and toxicities associated with alemtuzumab were collected retrospectively. Results: Thirty-nine of 42 patients had chronic lymphocytic leukemia, 2 had mycosis fungoides, and 1 had T-cell post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. In contrast to previous reports, 42% were treated by community practitioners and 83% received alemtuzumab subcutaneously. The median time from diagnosis to alemtuzumab was 58 months, with a median age of 63 years at alemtuzumab treatment. Patients received a median of 4 treatments prior to starting alemtuzumab. One of 42 patients (2%) achieved a complete response, 20 (48%) achieved a partial response, 13 (31%) had stable disease, and 4 (10%) had progressive disease. The median post-alemtuzumab overall survival was 15.1 months and the median progression-free survival was 5.4 months. Response to alemtuzumab correlated with an increased progression- free survival (11 months versus 3.6 months, p=0.001) and time to next treatment (15.7 months versus 5.4 months, p=0.004). Significant adverse events included grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (75%) or thrombocytopenia (42%), infections (54%) including CMV reactivation (6%), and death (12%). Patients who received alemtuzumab in the community setting had a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia (p=0.05) and infection (p=0.03) compared to academic centres, although no difference in overall survival was noted. Conclusion: Alemtuzumab can be safely administered in a wide variety of clinical settings, including community practice, and is associated with a high level of activity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".