MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Phase I study of inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) combined with R-GDP for relapsed CD22+ B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL).

2013· article· en· W2243412420 on OpenAlexaff
Randeep Sangha, Andrew Davies, Nam H. Dang, Michinori Ogura, M. Luisa Paccagnella, Revathi Ananthakrishnan, Erik Vandendries, Goh Yeow Tee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGastroenterologyNeutropeniaRituximabInternal medicineCalicheamicinFebrile neutropeniaToxicityLymphomaGemcitabineRegimenChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2574 Background: CD22 is expressed on most B-NHL. INO, an anti-CD22 antibody linked to calicheamicin, has activity in refractory B-NHL. This study hypothesized that INO plus rituximab, gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (R-GDP) for relapsed CD22+ B-NHL was safe and tolerable. Methods: Patients (pts) with relapsed CD22+ B-NHL treated with ≥1 prior R-chemo regimen were enrolled using an up-and-down independent dose-escalation schema for G and P. INO (0.8 mg/m2 day 2) was combined with R-GDP (R 375 mg/m2, G, and P day 1; oral D 40 mg days 1-4) on a 21-d cycle for up to 6 cycles. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) included febrile neutropenia, grade (Gr) 4 ANC lasting ≥7 d, Gr 4 platelets ≥7 d, Gr ≥3 platelets with bleeding and transfusion support, Gr ≥3 QTc prolongation, Gr 4 AST/ALT, Gr 2 bilirubin ≥7 d, G-CSF during cycle 1, Gr ≥3 clinically significant or drug-related nonhematologic toxicity ≥7 d, and Gr ≥2 drug-related nonhematologic toxicity causing dose delay of ≥7 d. Results: Thirty-seven pts were treated: 15 DLBCL, 11 FL, 7 MCL, 1 MZL, 1 SLL, and 2 indolent B-NHL. Characteristics: aged 33 to 81 y (median 65 y); 34 with ECOG PS £1; median of 2 prior chemo regimens (range 1-6); 5 refractory to prior therapy. No DLTs were observed at the starting dose of G 500 mg/m2, P 37.5 mg/m2 (n = 6); 2 DLTs (febrile neutropenia, Gr 2 platelets) at G 1000 mg/m2, P 37.5 mg/m2 (n = 3); no DLTs at G 1000 mg/m2, P 0 mg/m2 (n = 6); 2 DLTs (febrile neutropenia; Gr 4 ANC ≥7 d) at G 500 mg/m2, P 50 mg/m2 (n = 8); and 2 DLTs (Gr 3 hypokalemia, Gr 4 neutropenic sepsis) at G 500 mg/m2, P 75 mg/m2 (n = 4). In a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) confirmation cohort of 10 additional pts, 3 pts had DLTs (2 with Gr 4 platelets, 1 with febrile neutropenia); thus MTD was determined to be INO 0.8 mg/m2, R 375mg/m2, G 500 mg/m2, D 40 mg, P 50 mg/m2. Gr ≥3 adverse events included thrombocytopenia (68%), neutropenia (54%), lymphopenia (32%), anemia (27%), leukopenia (24%), hypokalemia (22%), fatigue (11%), and febrile neutropenia (11%). Median treatment cycle was 4 (range 1-6). There were 8 complete and 9 partial responses. Conclusions: INO 0.8 mg/m2 with R-GDP is tolerable at reduced doses of G (500 mg/m2) and P (50 mg/m2). Preliminary efficacy is being explored in the ongoing MTD expansion cohort. Clinical trial information: NCT01055496.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→