MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2243579121 · doi:10.6844/ncku.2011.00208

An Examination of Customer Retention in Mobile Telecommunications in the Canadian Context

2011· dissertation· zh· W2243579121 on OpenAlex
白漢彌

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue成功大學國際經營管理研究所碩士班學位論文 · 2011
Typedissertation
Languagezh
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessCustomer retentionMarketingMobile phoneLeverage (statistics)Service qualityCustomer delightCustomer satisfactionContext (archaeology)Service providerCustomer advocacyAdvertisingService (business)TelecommunicationsEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Customer retention is an important field of study in maturing markets. Using the Canadian mobile phone market as an example, this paper studies the major motivators of customer retention and their interrelationships. The motivators have been discovered through a literature review. Once these relationships are found, they are weighted by their influence on customer retention, and strategies from four Canadian mobile service providers are evaluated. The complete surveys and provider strategies are included as appendices. The motivators of customer retention are divided into three dimensions: Cost, Product Quality, and Customer Experience. Within the dimensions are 8 criteria: Service Price and Switching Costs; Phone Service Quality and Phone Plan Quality; Complaint Management, Customer Service Quality, Brand Image, and Social Norms respectively. The findings suggest that there is a risk to the major carriers from well-financed foreign entrants, and that successful strategies will require strong leverage of price and quality advantages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it