MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2243637849

Searching for Quasars and Beyond

2012· article· en· W2243637849 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jessica A. Kirkpatrick

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicScientific Research and Discoveries
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBrookhaven National LaboratoryCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityNew Mexico State UniversityAlfred P. Sloan FoundationJohns Hopkins UniversityHigh Energy PhysicsU.S. Department of EnergySmithsonian InstitutionNational Science Foundation
KeywordsQuasarRedshiftPhysicsAstrophysicsSkyPhotometry (optics)BossGalaxyLimiting magnitudeAstronomyStars
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS), a five-year spectroscopic survey of 10,000 square-degrees, achieved first light in late 2009. One of the key goals of BOSS is to measure the signature of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) in the distribution of Ly-α absorption from the spectra of a sample of ~150,000 <italic>z</italic> > 2.2 quasars in conjunction with measuring the redshifts of 1.6 million luminous red galaxies with high completeness to<italic>i</italic> ~ 19.9 at <italic>z</italic> ~ 0.7. One of the biggest challenges in achieving this goal is an efficient target selection algorithm for quasars in the redshift range 2.2 < <italic>z</italic> < 3.5, where their colors tend to overlap those of the far more numerous stars. During the first year of the BOSS survey, quasar target selection methods were developed and tested to meet the requirement of delivering at least 15 quasars per square-degree in this redshift range, with a goal of 20, out of 40 targets per square-degree allocated to the quasar survey. To achieve these surface densities, the magnitude limit of the quasar targets was set at <italic>g</italic> ≤ 22.0 or <italic>r</italic> ≤ 21.85.In this thesis I present a new method for quasar target selection using photometric fluxes and a Bayesian probabilistic approach. For our purposes I target quasars using Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) photometry to a magnitude limit of <italic>g</italic> = 22. The efficiency and completeness of this technique is measured using the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) data, taken in 2010. This “likelihood” technique was used for the uniformly selected (CORE) sample of targets in BOSS year one spectroscopy to be realized in the 9th SDSS data release. When targeting at a density of 40 objects per square-degree (the BOSS quasar targeting density) the efficiency of this technique in recovering <italic>z</italic> > 2.2 quasars is 40%. The completeness compared to all quasars identified in BOSS data is 65%. An extension of the “likelihood” technique is also described. This <italic>SDSS-XDQSO</italic> technique builds models of the distributions of stars and quasars in flux space down to the flux limit by applying the extreme-deconvolution method to estimate the underlying density. I convolve this density with the flux uncertainties when evaluating the probability that an object is a quasar. This approach results in a targeting algorithm that is more principled, more efficient, and faster than other similar methods. With BOSS's new catalog of quasar and galaxy data, exciting new science can be done. Whether luminous quasars reside in dark matter halos of the same mass and accrete at different rates, or live in halos of different masses and accretion is near the Eddington limit, is still an open question. Here, I present measurements of the luminosity-dependence of quasar clustering, using QSO data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Data Release 7, 2dF-SDSS LRG and QSO Survey (2SLAQ), and SDSS-III: Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS).In my quasar sample I have 3100 spectroscopically confirmed quasarswith a redshift range of (0.5 < <italic>z</italic> <1.0), luminosity range of (-27 < M < -21), down to <italic>i</italic>-band 22.14. In my galaxy sample I have 5.23 million photometric galaxies brighter than <italic>z</italic>-band = 23.50, selected from the CFHT (Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope) Survey of Stripe-82 (CS82). The cross-correlation is well described by a power law with slope 1.77 ± 0.1 and <italic>r<sub>0</sub></italic> = 5.05 ± 0.14 <italic>h<sup>-1</sup></italic> Mpc, which is consistent with previous findings. I determine a large-scale quasar bias, <italic>b<sub>QSO</sub></italic> = 1.46 ± 0.18, at redshift <italic>z</italic>=0.7. When I divide the quasar sample into low/high luminosity samples I find luminosity depended quasar clustering at a 4.56 σ significance level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicScientific Research and DiscoveriesFrench-language works237,207