Reactive power compensation in three phase high output inductive power transfer
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inductive power transfer becomes increasingly more popular as a method for contact less charging of high power loads. Enabled by the rapid progress in power electronics components and controls, the power transfer solutions cross the previously unattainable boundaries of power levels and cost limits. Because of the high frequencies necessary for voltage induction in the secondary parts of the transformers and because of a rather low magnetic coupling, the system would have to constantly supply high levels of the reactive power, generating very high losses and limiting the available output power. Various tuning techniques have developed to tune-out the reactive power. In this paper a systematic approach to tuning of a high power three phase coupled transformer is presented and arithmetical calculations backed by simulation utilizing its values from the electromagnetic FEA analysis. The approach is based on the fundamental frequency approximation neglecting the higher order harmonics which is valid for tuning the system at the fundamental harmonics of the switching frequency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it