Seasonal inertia of macrozooplankton communities in the Lazarev Sea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lazarev Sea macrozooplankton communities were sampled by RMT8 in the upper 200 m of the water column in summer (December-January), autumn (April-May) and winter (July-August) during the German SO-GLOBEC (2004-2007). Diphyes antarctica, chaetoganths and euphausiids were the major contributors to total densities, each averaging > 10 ind.1000m-3 in all seasons. Community Bray-Curtis similarities were about 68% within seasons and only slightly less between seasons (about 61%). The major contributors to seasonal dissimilarity were Thysanoessa macrura (14 ind.1000m-3) and Limacina helicina (o.7 ind.1000m-3) occuring predominantly in summer, Euphausia superba occurring predominantly in autumn and winter (>15 ind.1000m-3), Eukrohnia hamata decreasing from about 7 to 1 ind.1000m-3 between summer and winter, and the winter peak of Ihlea racovitzai (2 ind.1000m-3). Changes were primarily attributed to migration out of the epipelagic layer and seasonal population decline. Overall, the similarity between seasons was high and total densities did not differ significantly between seasons, averaging 52.47, 59.14 and 46.28 ind.1000m-3 in summer, autumn and winter respectively. In view of low winter primary production, it is predicted that the epipelagic had changed from bottom-up controlled in summer to top-down controlled in winter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".