MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2244348671

Reimagining Women's History in the Fiction of Éilís Ní Dhuibhne, Anne Enright, and Kate O'Riordan

2008· article· en· W2244348671 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Caitriona Moloney

Bibliographic record

VenuePostcolonial text · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIrish and British Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMythologyNarrativeLegendIrishLiteratureHistoryContext (archaeology)PostmodernismInterpretation (philosophy)SociologyArt historyArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reimagining Women's History in the Fiction of Eilis Ni Dhuibhne, Anne Enright, and Kate O'Riordan New Irish women writers' historical fiction uses history to represent what history has omitted; much like postcolonial history, women's fiction shows how memories and records of women are constituted by denial, hostility and neglect. This article looks at how the historical fiction of Eilis Ni Dhuibhne, Anne Enright, and Kate O'Riordan represents absent women through narrative strategies that demonstrate the pitfalls and suggest remedies to the challenges of postcolonial women's history. This historical fiction manages to represent the absence of the colonized woman, without committing Spivak's error, the allegedly inevitable usurpation of the subaltern's voice. Ni Dhuibhne's short fiction uses ancient Irish legend to show how women's participation in history could be denied and suggests some consequences. Ni Dhuibhne's narrative technique of intertextualizing old Irish myth in her fiction emphasizes the consequences of silencing women in history. Her postmodern method exceeds direct parallels to myth, but rather re-imagines the motifs of ancient Irish myth in a contemporary context, suggesting new modes of interpretation for both. Ni Dhuibhne's use of myth suggests the enormity of the exclusion of women from history; she creates a voice for that absent presence, without speaking for her. In short stories from The Portable Virgin, as well as in her latest novel, The Pleasure of Eliza, Anne Enright illustrates the possible effects of misogyny on history. Enright's narrative technique employs metaphor and symbols to situate Eliza in a long tradition of colonizing adventurers. Enright revises the alledgedly historical biographies of Eliza, which she characterizes as sneering excess, but unlike Eliza's biographers, Enright gives Eliza a voice that suggests both her disempowered subject position--herself a victim of imperialism and gender discrimination both in Ireland and Paraguay--and her power as an icon of sexuality, beauty, and nationalism. The title of the novel, The Pleasure of Eliza, indicates the ambivalence of Eliza as subject and agent. Kate O'Riordan's historical fiction focuses on the process of recovering lost historical records of women's past. Her The Boy in the Moon emphasizes the scarcity of records and artifacts in both the history of women and in the history of a colony. O'Riordan's protagonist acts like a contemporary scholar or researcher who recovers lost texts and learns how to read them. She finds, reads, and interprets an extremely sparse journal that reveals the history of her mother in law, a barely literate farm woman in the West of Ireland. O'Riordan's fiction gives a voice to this previously silenced women. All three of these writers demonstrate how art presents the unrepresentable, while avoiding the postcolonial error, usurpation of the subaltern's voice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score0.774

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePostcolonial textSame topicIrish and British StudiesFrench-language works237,207