MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

COMPARISON OF STRAWBERRY PLUGS FROM DORMANT PLANTS TO CANADIAN TIP CUTTINGS

2003· article· en· W2244352319 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P.R. Probasco, S.A. Garrison

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Horticulturae · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBerry genetics and cultivation research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCuttingHorticultureBotanyEnvironmental scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New Jersey strawberry plantings on plastic mulch are normally planted with plug plants from Canadian tip culture in the month of September. In order to utilize new cultivars, we evaluated the technique of growing plug plants from dormant plants out of cold storage (28°C). These plants were dug in April and placed in storage until mid-July. The dormant plants were transplanted into a 36-cell tray containing a peat-lite mix and grown over the summer months outdoors in full sunlight. Blooms were removed from the dormant plugs twice during August before planting. Runner tips from Canada were grown in a 50-cell tray containing a peat-lite mix during August in a nearby greenhouse and set out on September 9 in the field alongside the dormant plug plants in a randomized block design. The cultivars Chandler, Northeastern, Seneca, and Sweet Charlie were included in this study. Marketable yield of the dormant plants was 12579 kg/ha as compared to 15015 kg/ha from the Canadian tip plugs. Fruit size was 17.2 g/berry for the dormant plugs vs. 17.6 g/berry for the tip cuttings. Chandler remains the standard cultivar for commercial growers in New Jersey.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.771
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa HorticulturaeSame topicBerry genetics and cultivation researchFrench-language works237,207