COMPARISON OF STRAWBERRY PLUGS FROM DORMANT PLANTS TO CANADIAN TIP CUTTINGS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New Jersey strawberry plantings on plastic mulch are normally planted with plug plants from Canadian tip culture in the month of September. In order to utilize new cultivars, we evaluated the technique of growing plug plants from dormant plants out of cold storage (28°C). These plants were dug in April and placed in storage until mid-July. The dormant plants were transplanted into a 36-cell tray containing a peat-lite mix and grown over the summer months outdoors in full sunlight. Blooms were removed from the dormant plugs twice during August before planting. Runner tips from Canada were grown in a 50-cell tray containing a peat-lite mix during August in a nearby greenhouse and set out on September 9 in the field alongside the dormant plug plants in a randomized block design. The cultivars Chandler, Northeastern, Seneca, and Sweet Charlie were included in this study. Marketable yield of the dormant plants was 12579 kg/ha as compared to 15015 kg/ha from the Canadian tip plugs. Fruit size was 17.2 g/berry for the dormant plugs vs. 17.6 g/berry for the tip cuttings. Chandler remains the standard cultivar for commercial growers in New Jersey.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".