Bibliographic record
Abstract
unpublished notes on what constitutes the poetic; an inedit entitled Visages du qui-vive.And this is, indeed, a fme balance in a fme book by a poet who, in 1996, gathering together selections of his earlier work dating back to 1969 for a collective volume with Mercure de France, ended up radically and movingly rewriting his selections to give us his beautiful Dans la lumiere inachevee.Elaborated far from the madding crowd of theorists and formalists, Dhainhaut's reflection on the poetic tell us much about his work as a whole: the primacy of the lived, the touched, the seen, but also the felt and what is "dreamed" in the inner world; the reciprocal lessons thus to be explored (rather than learned or fixed) allying the poetic and the telluric; the sense of that ever renewable "opening" the poetic can create, essentially within us, and deep; the consequent limitlessness of poetry's domain, its energizing of us, too, via its surging from realms quite indescribable and with purposes often obscure at the heart of the poetic gesture, beyond contestation or even revolt; the sense of language's -and being's -vast, inexhaustible global field of meaning, one poem ever related to all of poetry; "paroles de vie, quoi qu'il arrive", something we can all too easily forget in our hierarchisation and judging of difference.Poetry, for Dhainhaut, perhaps at best, is a "caresse franchissant/l'ecorce, le galet, la paupiere close": it is access, desire thereof, attentiveness, love.His poetic texts unfold with serenity, in compact stanzas, haiku-like almost at times.Insights are darting, though never abrupt, violent, seeking to avoid the flagrant or the demonstrative.A subtle pen, and one worthy of our patient attention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".