Line tension of multicomponent bilayer membranes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The line tension or edge energy of bilayer membranes self-assembled from binary amphiphilic molecules is studied using self-consistent-field theory (SCFT). Specifically, solutions of the SCFT equations corresponding to an infinite membrane with a circular pore, or an open membrane, are obtained for a coarse-grained model in which the amphiphilic species and hydrophilic solvents are represented by ABandED diblock copolymers and C homopolymers, respectively. The edge energy of the membrane is extracted from the free energy of the open membranes. Results for membranes composed of mixtures of symmetric and cone- or inverse cone-shaped amphiphilic molecules with neutral and/or repulsive interactions are obtained and analyzed. It is observed that an increase in the concentration of the cone-shaped species leads to a decrease of the line tension. In contrast, adding inverse cone-shaped copolymers results in an increase of the line tension. Furthermore, the density profile of the copolymers reveals that the line tension is regulated by the distribution of the amphiphiles at the bilayer edge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".