Role of serum erythropoietin, erythropoietin-independent erythroid colony formation, and bone marrow assessment in the diagnosis of polycythemia vera in patients with JAK2 V617F mutation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
7085 Background: The discovery of the JAK2 V617F mutation in over 95% of polycythemia vera (PV) patients has led to the development of the new 2008 World Health Organization diagnostic criteria for PV. These specify a requirement for an elevated hemoglobin (Hb, males: >185 g/L, females: >165 g/L) and either evidence of JAK2-mutant cells plus any one of the following minor criteria: a below normal level of serum erythropoietin (Epo), detectable Epo-independent erythroid colony (EEC) formation in vitro, or panmyelosis in the bone marrow, or two of the latter in the absence of detectable JAK2-mutant cells. However, in patients with an elevated Hb and JAK2V617F positivity, there are few data to determine whether any of the 3 minor criteria actually add an independent contribution to the diagnosis of PV. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 77 patients who had an elevated Hb and were positive for the JAK2 V617F mutation and who also had a test for at least one of the 3 minor criteria (serum Epo level: n = 53; EEC formation: n = 66; bone marrow examination: n = 16) to determine the frequency of cases who might lack one or more of these. Results: Although the number of patients with a complete set of data was limited, the results, nevertheless, were sufficient to show that all 3 minor criteria were highly represented and all 77 of the patients analyzed (100%) were positive for at least one of them; i.e., 47 of 53 tested (89%) had a reduced serum Epo level; 65 of 66 tested (98%) had EECs and 15 of 16 tested (94%) had evidence of bone marrow panmyelosis. Conclusions: Neither the Epo level, nor the presence of EECs nor evidence of bone marrow panmyelosis provided additional diagnostic specificity in a population of 77 patients with both JAK2 V617F-positive cells and an elevated Hb. Consideration should be given to limiting serum Epo, EEC, and bone marrow assessments to JAK2 mutant-negative patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".