MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2245545968 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511489822.030

The Netherlands: tolerance and traditionalism

2006· book-chapter· en· W2245545968 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Cuyvers

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2006
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Education and Schools
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraditionalismQuarter (Canadian coin)Independence (probability theory)GeographyEuropean unionPopulationEconomic historyPolitical scienceDemographyAncient historyHistorySociologyHumanitiesArchaeologyArtEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A HISTORICAL OUTLINE OF THE NETHERLANDS The Netherlands originated from a union of regions (Republic of Seven Provinces) led by the provinces of South-Holland and North-Holland, and with members of the House of Orange as military leaders. Under the Oranges the country gained independence in an Eighty Years War against Spain that ended in 1648. After the French revolution the Netherlands became a kingdom. Its present population is just over 16 million inhabitants, of whom approximately one-quarter is concentrated in the densely populated area around Amsterdam and Rotterdam. The Netherlands was one of the founding members of the European Union. ECOLOGICAL FEATURES The Netherlands is a small and densely populated area in northwest Europe, of which the history and ecological system is dominated by the sea and the large rivers. Large parts of the country, called polders, are below sea-level and have to be protected by dikes. The same goes for the substantial landwinnings from an inland sea made in the twentieth century. The cooperation needed to protect the land has become a token for the political model of constant communication in search of joint solutions, called the “poldermodel.” It may well be that this cooperation model has still deeper roots in the coexistence of approximately equal Protestant and Catholic religious groups and the strong merchant orientation of the provinces of Holland in the period that they dominated the world seas (first half of the seventeenth century).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicReligious Education and SchoolsFrench-language works237,207