Molecular cloning, characterization and expression patterns of heat shock protein 60 (HSP60) in the laying duck (<i>Anas platyrhynchos</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wang, D., Lu, L., Tian, Y., Li, J., Shen, J., Tao, Z., Li, G. and Xu, N. 2012. Molecular cloning, characterization and expression patterns of heat shock protein 60 (HSP60) in the laying duck (Anas platyrhynchos). Can. J. Anim. Sci. 92: 425–432. In the present study, we cloned and characterized the HSP60 cDNA from Anas platyrhyncho (designated as ApHSP60) using a combination of homology and rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE). The full-length of ApHSP60 is 2027 bp in length, with an open reading frame of 1707 bp encoding a putative protein of 569 amino acids. Comparison of amino acid sequences of HSP60 revealed ApHSP60 is highly conserved, especially in the domains of classical HSP60 family signatures. ApHSP60 transcripts were at low expression levels throughout embryo development. ApHSP60 transcripts were constitutively expressed in all tested tissues of untreated laying duck, with a maximum level in the liver. Fluorescent real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was applied to determine ApHSP60 expression after exposure to different thermal shocks. Under long term treatment with both 30°C and 35°C, ApHSP60 transcripts in heart and liver were significantly up-regulated. Otherwise, ApHSP60 transcripts were remarkably down-regulated in heart and liver under acute challenge with 40°C (a fatal temperature for laying duck). A time-dependent expression pattern of ApHSP60 was found in the recovery period after heat shock reaction. ApHSP60 expression levels in liver and heart were immediately up-regulated to the maximum at 1 h post-challenge, and then decreased to pre-challenge levels by 2 h and 3 h post-challenge, respectively. These results suggest that mRNA expression of the ApHSP60 gene is constitutive and inducible. Meanwhile, it plays an important role in response to heat stressors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".