VEGF-Trap for patients (pts) with recurrent platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC): Preliminary results of a randomized, multicenter phase II study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
5508 Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is over-expressed in EOC and associated with poor prognosis. VEGF Trap, a potent angiogenesis inhibitor fusion protein, is comprised of portions of human VEGF-receptor R1+R2 (Flt-1, KDR) extracellular domains and fused to the Fc portion of human IgG. VEGF Trap binds VEGF-A and neutralizes all VEGF-A isoforms plus placental growth factor. Methods: This is a randomized, double blind, multicenter, 2-stage, phase II trial of VEGF Trap (2 or 4 mg/kg) administered intravenously every 2 weeks, in pts with recurrent EOC. Eligible criteria included 2 or 3 prior chemo regimens for advanced disease; platinum- resistance, topotecan- and/or liposomal doxorubicin-resistance; no prior VEGF inhibitor treatment; ECOG performance status 0–2; normal organ function; no proteinuria (<500 mg/24hrs or UPCR =1); controlled blood pressure. This Simon 2 stage design, requires 3 responders out of 42 evaluable, in each arm to continue accrual into stage 2. Results: Across 62 centers in Europe, Canada and US, rapid accrual led to 162 pts randomized from 5/06 to 12/06. Median age: 58, PS (0,1,2): 56,40,4%. Of 45 pts currently in the database, across the two arms, adverse events included (any grade): headache (38%), fatigue (36%), dysphonia (33%), nausea (29%), asthenia (24%), diarrhea (18%), hypertension (16%), proteinuria (7%), renal dysfunction (4%). Grade 3–4, included: hypertension (9%), proteinuria (4%), encephalopathy (2%) and renal failure (2%). Of the 162 pts who had at minimum one cycle, study drug-related SAE include (N): thrombocytopenia (1), anemia (1), headache (1) asthenia (2),dyspnea (1), hypertension (4), bowel perforation (2), encephalopathy (1), renal failure (2), proteinuria (1), phlebitis (1) and pulmonary embolism (1). 5 partial responses (11%) have been reported. Conclusions: VEGF Trap has activity in this heavily-pretreated EOC population. The first stage of accrual is complete and updated results will be presented. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".