MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fatigue Crack Initiation and Propagation Behaviors in Rotating Bending of SNCM439 Steel in Very High Cycle Regime

2015· article· en· W2246833446 on OpenAlex
Akiyoshi NAKAGAWA, B. Lian, Takashi Kondo, D.P. Romilly, Noriyasu OGUMA, Masahiro JONO, Tatsuo Sakai

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKey engineering materials · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFatigue and fracture mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceFracture mechanicsFracture (geology)Stress intensity factorFracture toughnessCrack closureStructural engineeringCoalescence (physics)Composite materialBendingStress concentrationEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to ensure the long term durability of mechanical structures, the fatigue property of structural components should be clarified in the long life region such as the gigacycle regime. The rotating bending fatigue tests in very high cycle regime were carried out for a nickel chromium molybdenum steel for structural use of machines (JIS Material Code: SNCM439) in this study. Based on the initiation site of the fatigue crack, fracture modes were classified into the following typical three modes: (1) usual surface fracture, (2) surface defect-initiated fracture and (3) interior inclusion-initiated fracture, respectively. In S-N diagram, experimental data in the usual surface fracture mode appeared at higher stress levels with fewer loading cycles, whereas the data in the other two fracture modes appeared at lower stress levels with more loading cycles. Thus, the duplex S-N property was confirmed for this steel in the very long life regime. In order to clarify the fatigue mechanism of the interior inclusion-initiated fracture, the quantitative evaluations were made by applying the stress intensity factor range. The fatigue crack initiation and propagation processes in the interior inclusion-initiated fracture were divided into four stages: formation of the fine granular area (FGA) due to initiation and coalescence of micro-debondings, formation of the fish-eye due to penny-shape crack propagation, crack propagation as surface crack and final catastrophic fracture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.684

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it