MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2246920853 · doi:10.1016/s0967-0653(97)83086-4

10.1016/s0967-0653(97)83086-4

2000· article· en· W2246920853 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Monique Guillou

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyBayAbiotic componentForestryHumanitiesBiologyEcologyPhilosophyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Massive outbreaks of starfish (Asteridae) occur periodically in European coastal waters. The origins of these irregular population increases are poorly understood. In the subtidal zone of the Bay of Douamenez, Brittany, France, the occurrence of several species of Asteridae and the polymodal size distribution differentiate these aggregations from the single year-class and monospecific intertidal infestations. An echinoderm population survey from 1982 to 1988 showed an increase in carnivorous starfish (principally Asterias rubens and Marthasterias glacialis) from 1981 to 1984, when the population reached carrying capacity. At this time, a trophic imbalance between starfish and bivalves was observed. From 1985 onward, the total echinoderm biomass decreased coincidentally with an increase in the two super predators the starfish, Luidia sarsi and Luidia ciliaris. From 1986 to 1988, the primary carnivorous echinoderm biomass appeared insufficient to meet the food requirements of the Luidia species. The role of the different factors controlling these starfish population changes is discussed. Whereas the hypothesis of regulation by Luidia predation fits the observations, it is also possible that direct or indirect temperature effects are also involved in population changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.728
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)1.0001.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture StudiesFrench-language works237,207