Rapid Serial Sarcomere Loss Caused by Electrical Stimulation in Rabbit Triceps Surae Muscles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Muscle spasms, such as those observed in cerebral palsy patients, are involuntary muscle contractions that usually occur due to a lesion in the brain. These muscle spasms cause muscles to become hypoextensible, or very stiff. This hypoextensibility may be explained by a decrease in serial sarcomere number concomitant with a long stimulation period. In 1981, Tabary and Tardieu showed a 25% decrease in the number of serial sarcomeres in guinea pig Soleus muscles over a 12 hour stimulation period. As these results seem very extreme, it was necessary to try duplicating these results in our laboratory, as well as in a different animal model. The Medial Gastrocnemius, Plantaris, and Soleus muscles were stimulated via the tibial nerve in New Zealand White rabbits (n=3) for 10 hours in one of the legs (20 Hz at 3 times the α motoneuron threshold). The tibial nerve in the contralateral control leg was transected to ensure no cross- over training effects. After the stimulation period, the animals were sacrificed and the hind limbs were then placed in a 10% formalin solution at carefully controlled knee and ankle angles. Three to five samples were harvested from each muscle. After a digestion process, individual fascicles were teased out and mounted on prepared slides. These slides were then analyzed for fascicle length by using a camera system with specialized software and sarcomere lengths were determined using a laser diffraction method. Analysis showed that the serial sarcomere number decreased in the Medial Gastrocnemius by 23 ± 4.4%, in the Plantaris by 25 ± 2.9%, and the Soleus by 29 ± 7.0%. These numbers concur closely with the 25% loss of serial sarcomeres reported by Tabary and Tardieu in guinea pigs. These confirmed results will allow for more research to be done in this area.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".