MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2246998135

AZD2171 (Cediranib) is active in first line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC): Interim results of a phase II trial. A trial of the PMH Phase II Consortium.

2007· article· en· W2246998135 on OpenAlexaff
Srikala S. Sridhar, Mary J. MacKenzie, Sebastién J. Hotte, Som D. Mukherjee, Nevin Murray, Ian F. Tannock, Masoom A. Haider, Eric X. Chen, Lisa Wang, Ranuka Srinivasan, S. Percy Ivy, Malcolm J. Moore

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal cell carcinoma treatment
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterim analysisInternal medicinePhases of clinical researchRenal cell carcinomaOncologyGastroenterologyNeutropeniaPharmacologyUrologySurgeryToxicityClinical trial
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A10 Background: AZD2171 is a potent VEGF signaling inhibitor of all 3 VEGF receptors, with additional activity against c-Kit. It has been shown in preclinical models to inhibit angiogenesis and block tumor growth.Agents targeting the VEGFR have been shown to be particularly active in first-line metastatic RCC. Methods: In this phase II study, AZD 2171 45 mg daily was administered to pts with adv/met RCC, ECOG 0-2, who had no prior cytokine or anti-angiogenic therapy. The primary endpt was tumor control rate (OR+SD). Secondary endpts were median and 6mo PFS, MS, OS, and toxicity. DCE-MRI used to assess changes in blood flow and permeability during treatment. pK studies were done on d8, 15, 28. Pre and post rx levels of soluble markers of angiogenic growth factors and receptors and CEC have been collected for analysis at study completion.
 Results: 32 pts. (M: F 3:29; PS 0:1 17:15, prior RT 7pts) were accrued from Jan/06-Apr/07. Twenty-nine pts. were evaluable for response (2 too early, 1 never received drug). Best objective response by independent review: 9 confirmed PR (incl. 1 unconfirmed CR), 2 unconfirmed PR, 11 SD (8 had shrinkage >20% not sufficient for PR), 4 PD, 3 inevaluable. Median PFS 8.7mo and 6mo was PFS 55%. Most common AE (32 evaluable pts) fatigue, diarrhea, hypertension, inc. creatinine, voice changes. Grade 3+ AE hypertension, fatigue, joint pain, abdominal pain, and dyspnea. 22/29 pts required dose reductions to 30mg(13pts) and 20mg (9pts) respectively. 13 pts remain on treatment with accrual ongoing to target 37 evaluable pts. Conclusions: AZD2171 (Cediranib) shows activity in first-line metastatic RCC with an OR of 9/29=31%(14-48%), and clinical benefit rate (PR+SD) 22/29=76%(56-89%). Updated information including pK and DCE-MRI results will be available at time of presentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicRenal cell carcinoma treatmentFrench-language works237,207