La « langue française » dans la presse francophone : idéologies, représentations et enjeux discursifs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les bouleversements sociaux et culturels et les innovations technologiques poussent rflchir aux changements subis par les idologies linguistiques l'poque actuelle : qu'en est-il aujourd'hui de l'image du franais conu en tant que langue nationale, langue de prestige, du bon usage, de la clart ? L'analyse d'un corpus de presse franaise, qubcoise et africaine, tudie notamment sur les plans linguistique et discursif, permettra de rflchir aux regards ports sur le franais dans des contextes plurilingues et de saisir, de ce fait, l'volution dont les idologies concernant le franais font tat. Sur le plan mthodologique, nous envisageons d'tudier la dimension discursive afin de relever les stratgies qui concourent l'laboration des idologies linguistiques : les positionnements nonciatifs, les valeurs positives ou ngatives qui sont attribues au franais de manire plus ou moins explicite, les prdiscours ne sont que quelques-uns des paramtres qui nous permettront de dcrire les contours des idologies linguistiques en jeu.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".