MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An open-label multicenter phase II study of oral lapatinib (GW572016) as single agent, second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

2005· article· en· W2247329814 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony Fields, David Rinaldi, Charles Henderson, Colin Germond, Luis Chu, Kimberli J. Brill, L. Leopold, M. S. Berger

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Canadian institutionsGlaxoSmithKline (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLapatinibInternal medicineIrinotecanRashResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsGastroenterologyDiscontinuationAdverse effectNauseaOxaliplatinPhases of clinical researchColorectal cancerOncologyCancerSurgeryChemotherapyBreast cancerTrastuzumab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3583 Background: Lapatinib is an orally active, reversible inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase activity of ErbB1 (EGFR) and ErbB2 (HER-2/neu). This multicenter, open-label, phase II study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of single-agent lapatinib in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma, whose tumors progressed on first-line therapy with 5-fluorouracil in combination with irinotecan or oxaliplatin. Methods: Eighty-six (86) patients received 1250mg of oral lapatinib daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Safety and efficacy assessments were performed at 4-week and 8-week intervals respectively. Tumor response was determined by an independent review committee using RECIST guidelines. Results: The median age was 60 years (22–83) and median KPS was 90 (70–100). Patients were not selected based on ErbB expression; however, 54.2% and 44.1% of the patients had positive expression (+1, +2, +3) for ErbB1 and ErbB2, respectively. The most commonly encountered adverse events were: diarrhea (45% grade 1, 2, 5% grade 3), rash (33% grade 1, 2, 2% grade 3), fatigue (27% grade 1, 2, 2% grade 3), nausea (20% grade 1, 2, 1% grade 3), anorexia (16% grade 1, 2, 2% grade 3), and vomiting (14% grade 1, 2). In addition, 3 (3%) patients experienced a drug-related Grade 2 (≥20%) decrease in LVEF. All decreases in LVEF were asymptomatic and resolved within three weeks after discontinuation of lapatinib. One (1%) patient experienced a confirmed partial response; however, five patients experienced a minor response with cytoreduction of 20%, 22.4%, 22.8%, 26.8%, and 34% at week 8. Overall, five patients experienced clinical benefit with stable disease for ≥20 weeks. The median TTP and overall survival were 8 and 42.9 weeks respectively. Conclusions: Lapatinib was well tolerated, but demonstrated limited activity as second-line monotherapy in patients with recurrent metastatic colorectal cancer. Author Disclosure Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Role Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Funding Expert Testimony Other Remuneration GlaxoSmithKline GlaxoSmithKline GlaxoSmithKline GlaxoSmithKline

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score0.735

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.199
GPT teacher head0.523
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesFrench-language works237,207