MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A phase I study of ABT-751 in combination with docetaxel in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer

2006· article· en· W2247521924 on OpenAlexaff
Jorg Michels, Susan Ellard, Lyly Le, Nevin Murray, Emma S. Tomlinson Guns, A. Hagey, K. N.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsAbbott (Canada)BC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeutropeniaDocetaxelFebrile neutropeniaInternal medicineProstate cancerGastroenterologyChemotherapyPerformance statusSurgeryCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

4651 Background: ABT-751 (A) is a novel oral sulfonamide anti-microtubule agent with broad-spectrum preclinical activity including paclitaxel-resistant tumors and additive effect with docetaxel (D). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) with ABT-751 include peripheral neuropathy, ileus, and fatigue. The recommended phase II single-agent dose for a 21/28-day schedule is 200 mg/day. Methods: Patients (pts) with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), ECOG performance status ≤ 2, and adequate organ function were eligible. D was administered intravenously on day 1 and A was administered orally once daily on days 1–14 of a 21-day cycle for a maximum of 10 cycles. Starting dose was 60 mg/m2 D and 100 mg A; escalated in 4 dose levels (DLs) to 75 mg/m2 D and 200 mg A. Pts received 10 mg oral prednisone daily. Plasma for PK analyses was obtained. Results: 18 pts have been enrolled (3 pts/DL1, 3 pts/DL2, 6 pts/DL3, 6 pts/DL4), 17 pts are currently evaluable: median age 66 years, median PSA 250 μg/L, metastatic sites to bone and/or lymph nodes (17), visceral (2), prior chemotherapy 5 pts. The median number of treatment cycles was 6 (range 2–10). 2 pts experienced DLT (1 febrile neutropenia/DL 3 and 1 diarrhea/grade 4 neutropenia at DL4); these dose levels were expanded to 6 pts with no further DLT. Hematologic toxicities include febrile neutropenia (2 pts), grade 3/4 neutropenia (7 pts). Additional non-hematologic toxicities were grade 1/2 beside 1 episode of grade 3 diarrhea and lethargy each. AUC and Cmax for A were similar to single-agent data. AUC and Cmax for D appeared independent of ABT-751 dosing. PSA decline of ≥50% occurred in 10/16 evaluable pts (63%), ≥30% in 14/16 pts (89%) and <30% in 2/16 pts as best response thus far. Best response per RECIST in 12 pts with measurable disease was partial response in 4 pts (33%) and stable disease in 8 pts (67%). Conclusions: The combination of ABT-751 and docetaxel is well tolerated at the tested doses. PK results suggest no significant PK interaction. Early findings indicate encouraging clinical activity of the combination treatment. Extended accrual to the recommended phase II dose is ongoing to further define activity and toxicity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.412 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology→French-language works237,207→