MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2247774962 · doi:10.3928/0148-4834-20031201-06

Establishing Consensus About the Baccalaureate Entry-to-Practice Policy

2003· article· en· W2247774962 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ann Rhéaume

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nursing Education · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBaccalaureate DegreeNursingNursing practiceNurse educationPolitical scienceMedical educationMedicineHigher educationLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article is based on the results of a qualitative study examining educational reforms in New Brunswick, Canada, during the 1980s. Using the province of New Brunswick as a case study, three issues related to the baccalaureate entry-to-practice policy are examined. First, the process of upgrading nursing education to a baccalaureate degree and the conflict this change created between the Nurses Association of New Brunswick and the New Brunswick Nursing Union are described. Second, the reasons leaders of the professional nursing organization desired to upgrade nursing education are examined, and third, the issues underlying the conflict over nursing education are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.192
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.227
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.230
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1920.227
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.006
Science and technology studies0.0180.021
Scholarly communication0.0230.012
Open science0.0070.015
Research integrity0.0120.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nursing EducationSame topicNursing Education, Practice, and LeadershipFrench-language works237,207