MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2247834840 · doi:10.1093/ojlr/rwv024

<i>Holt v Hobbs</i>

2015· article· he· W2247834840 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford Journal of Law and Religion · 2015
Typearticle
Languagehe
FieldMedicine
TopicLegal Cases and Commentary
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompromisePetitionerLawSupreme courtStatutory lawQuarter (Canadian coin)Political scienceMajority opinionSociologyHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Statutory right to practice religion – Substantial burden on – Arkansas Department of Correction (ADC) grooming policy requiring inmates to be clean-shaven other than mustaches and quarter-inch beards for diagnosed dermatological problems – Muslim inmate challenging grooming policy under federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), asserting religious belief requiring he grow a beard but offering to maintain only half-inch beard as compromise – ADC rejecting compromise – District and appeals courts dismissing prisoner’s complaints – Supreme Court granting certiorari limited to question whether grooming policy violating RLUIPA to extent it prohibits petitioner from growing half-inch beard in accordance with his religious beliefs – Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, 42 USC s 2000 cc-1(a)(1)–(2); Arkansas Administrative Directive 98-04

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it