MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2247980017 · doi:10.7135/upo9780857285362.010

Markets, Privatisation and Justice: Some Critical Reflections

2012· book-chapter· en· W2247980017 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Philip Whitehead, Paul Crawshaw

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthem Press eBooks · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomic JusticeEconomicsPolitical scienceSociologyNeoclassical economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There's Something Different Going On – Have You Noticed?<br/><br/>We are in the vice-like grip of an acute paradox. At the critical moment when neoliberal capitalism has entered its latest crisis, the relentless pursuit of profitable markets on the back of neoliberal dogma is infiltrating an expanded set of organisational domains. At the precise historical juncture when lessons could be assimilated to modify if not rid the world of a failed and failing political economy where money is the ultimate standard of value, desperate attempts are being made to resuscitate an ailing system by prescribing more of the same rather than deciding that enough is enough. However, the unfolding catastrophe which is being played out in the global market place of ideas and material conditions, manifested in an ecological crisis, struggles over raw materials, deepening and widening social divisions (Žižek 2011), has not gone without challenge, protest, or resistance. The Occupy Movement in Madrid during May 2011, with eruptions on Wall Street in September, subsequently established its presence in other cities and countries. In fact, one of us was directly affected by the movement when travelling from Ottawa to Toronto on Saturday, 15 October 2011 to return from Canada to the United Kingdom.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthem Press eBooksSame topicPsychoanalysis, Philosophy, and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207