MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2248598790 · doi:10.5206/cie-eci.v34i2.9063

New Immigrants' Barriers to Participation in Society and the Economy

2005· article· en· W2248598790 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Atlanta Sloane-Seale

Bibliographic record

VenueComparative and International Education · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationSociologySituational ethicsPerspective (graphical)HumanitiesEthnologyPolitical scienceSocial psychologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on the barriers that new immigrants face, in spite of their utilization of the services provided, to their participation and integration into society and the economy in order to better understand the events, factors, and difficulties that have an impact on their economic outcomes. Qualitative methodology and a grounded theory perspective were used to develop themes and patterns from their stories. An inclusive, multidimensional framework, including institutional, structural, situational, dispositional, informational, and self-determination factors for thinking about their participation and integration into society and the knowledge economy related to employment and education has emerged from this study. These components are different in substance and manifestation, inhibit and/or enhance their integration, and operate independently, and/or complementarily with one another for maximum positive and/or negative impact. However, structural factors for employment and education appear to have a mediating influence on all the other factors. Cet article, portant sur les barrieres que les immigrants doivent sumlOnter dans leur participation et integration sociale et economique, malgre les services mis a leur disposition, cherche a mieux comprendre les evenements, les facteurs, et les difficultes qui ont un effet sur leurs consequences economiques. On se sert de la methodologie qualitative et de la perspective de la theorie fondee pour developper les themes et les motifs de leurs histoires. De cette recherche, surgit un cadre global et a dimensions multiples, comprenant les facteurs institutionnels, structurels, situationnels, informationnels, et d' autodetermination fonnant la base de leur participation et integration dans la societe et de leurs connaissances en economie ayant trait a leurs experiences pratiques et a leur formation. Ces composants sont differents en substance comme en manifestation. lIs peuvent entraver ou ameliorer leur integration et s'operent soit independamment ou de conserve avec les autres pour creer des effets positifs ou negatifs. Toutefois, les facteurs structurels a l'emploi et a la forrnation semblent avoir une influence mediatrice sur tous les autres facteurs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComparative and International EducationSame topicMigration, Ethnicity, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207