MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2248783178 · doi:10.11113/amst.v11i1.74

Effect of Casting Conditions on SMM Blended Polyethersulfone Hydro–Phobic/–Philic Composite Membranes: Characteristics and Desalination Performance in Membrane Distillation

2017· article· en· W2248783178 on OpenAlexaff
M. Qtaishat, M. Khayet, Takeshi Matsuura, K.C. Khulbe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Membrane Science & Technology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMembrane Separation Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMembraneMembrane distillationDesalinationEvaporationPhase inversionMaterials scienceChemical engineeringCastingContact anglePermeationChemistryComposite materialThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims at further improvement and development of the novel hydro–phobic/–philic composite membranes which are made specifically for membrane distillation (MD). This was attempted by studying the effect of the casting conditions during the membrane preparation process by the phase inversion method. Two variables were chosen to study, which are the evaporation time before gelation and the gelation path temperature. Some of the membranes were allowed to evaporate at room temperature for 2 or 3 minutes to study the effect of evaporation time. The temperature of the gelation path was varied to 4°C, 20°C or 60°C in order to study the gelation path temperature effect. The prepared membranes were characterized using gas permeation test, measurement of the liquid entry pressure of water (LEPw), X–ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), contact angle measurements and atomic force microscopy (AFM). The effects of the casting conditions on the membrane morphology were identified, which enabled us to link the membrane morphology to the membrane performance. The membranes were then tested for desalination of 0.5 M NaCl solution by direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) and the results were compared to commercial polytetraflouroethylene (PTFE) membrane. It was found that the membrane which was prepared with no evaporation time produced better flux than those with evaporation time. Regarding the gelation path temperature; the membrane prepared with gelation path temperature of 4°C was better than those prepared with gelation path temperature of 20 or 60°C. It should be emphasized that the DCMD flux of the membranes prepared with no evaporation time or with a gelation path temperature of 4°C was superior to the commercial one. Furthermore, all the prepared membranes were tested successfully for the desalination application. In other words, no NaCl was detected in the permeate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Membrane Science & TechnologySame topicMembrane Separation TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207