MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Absolute PSA value after androgen deprivation (AD) is a strong independent predictor of survival in new metastatic (D2) prostate cancer (PCa): Data from Southwest Oncology Group Trial 9346 (INT-0162)

2006· article· en· W2248833360 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Azam Hussain, Cathy Tangen, Paul F. Schellhammer, Emily Crawford, C. S. Higano, G. Wilding, A. Akdaş, Eric J. Small, Bryan Donnelly, Derek Raghavan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerUrologyInternal medicineProportional hazards modelCancerOncologyBiomarkerHazard ratioProstate-specific antigenMultivariate analysisGynecologyGastroenterologyConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

4517 Background: PSA is a biomarker for monitoring disease activity in PCa. It is not well established if absolute PSA values achieved after AD is prognostic in patients (pts) with new D2 PCa. Methods: Hormone naive D2 pts with baseline PSA ≥ 5ng/mL are treated with 7 months (ms) AD induction. Pts achieving PSA-n (PSA ≤ 4.0 ng/ml that is stable or declining on ms 6 and 7) are randomized to continuous vs. intermittent AD on month 8. To be eligible for this analysis (approved by Data Safety Monitoring Committee), pts had to have a prestudy PSA with at least 2 subsequent PSAs during induction and be registered at least 1 year prior to analysis date. Survival was defined from 8 months to death due to any cause. Associations were evaluated by proportional hazards regression models. P≤0.05 was statistically significant. Results: Of the first 1,395 registered pts, 1345 were eligible for this analysis. Median age was 70 years, median baseline PSA 76.1 ng/mL, 38% had bone pain (BP) and 47 % had Gleason sum (GS) > 7. Median number of on-study PSAs during induction was 5 (range: 2 -18). Of the 1,345 pts, 1134 achieved PSA-n with 965 maintaining PSA-n at end of induction. Of those achieving PSA-n, 604 (45% of all pts) had an undetectable PSA (PSA-u, ≤ 0.2 ng/mL) at end of induction. In multivariate analysis, 4 significant independent risk factors were associated with post-induction survival: Performance status, GS, BP, and being randomized. After adjustment for these factors, pts who had a PSA-n at the end of induction but not PSA-u had less than half the risk of death (RoD) as those who did not have PSA-n (HR: 0.41; 95% CI 0.32, 0.54, p < 0.001), and pts with PSA-u had about one-quarter the RoD as pts with no PSA-n (HR: 0.26; 95% CI 0.20, 0.35, p < 0.001). After adjustment for covariates, pts with PSA-u had significantly better survival than those with only PSA-n at end of induction (p < 0.001). The median overall survival was 13 ms for the 383 not normalized (95% CI: 11 to 16 ms), 44 ms for the 360 pts normalized but not undetectable (95% CI: 39 to 55 ms), and 75 ms for the 602 pts with PSA-u (95% CI: 62, 91 ms). Conclusion: Achieving a PSA-n or PSA-u after 7 ms of AD is a strong predictor of survival and should be used to tailor future trial design in new D2 pts. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.186
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→