MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A phase Ib study of oxaliplatin in combination with fluorouracil (5FU) and leucovorin (LV) in pediatric patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors

2007· article· en· W2248854698 on OpenAlexaff
Lia Gore, John F. Kuttesch, Stephen P. Hunger, Charles A. Herzog, A. Narendaren, Jessica Boklan, Nicholas K. Foreman, S. Percy Ivy, N. Boucher, Tanya Trippett

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOxaliplatinFOLFOXBolus (digestion)RegimenTolerabilityToxicityPharmacokineticsFluorouracilInternal medicinePediatric cancerColorectal cancerGastroenterologyChemotherapyUrologyOncologySurgeryCancerAdverse effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

9548 Background: Platinums have significant activity in a wide variety of pediatric tumors, and oxaliplatin exhibits synergy with 5FU and LV in adults with colorectal cancer in FOLFOX regimens. The primary objectives of this study are to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the modified FOLFOX6 regimen in pediatric tumors. Secondary objectives include safety, PK pharmacokinetic (PK) and PET scan efficacy analyses. Methods: Pts age <21 years with advanced cancers and adequate organ function are eligible. Patients are stratified by tumor type (CNS or non-CNS) to better delineate the potential neurotoxicity in patients with altered neurologic function. Pts received oxaliplatin starting at 85 mg/m2 and LV 400 mg/m2 over 2 hours on day 1 followed by a 5FU bolus of 400 mg/m2 then 2,400 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 46 hours, every 2 weeks (3 courses = 1 cycle), with integrated PK sampling in a limited dose escalation design. Standard 3+3 dose escalation, definitions of dose limiting toxicity (DLT), and dose modification for toxicity are implemented. The MTD is expanded to 15 patients to confirm and further characterize tolerability and toxicity. Results: To date, 15 very heavily pre-treated patients (7 M, 8 F) have received 25 cycles (range 1–4, median 2) of treatment at 2 dose levels. One of 8 pts at dose level 2 (oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2) developed DLT (delay in repeat treatment > 14 days due to grade 3 platelets). Treatment has been well tolerated. The most frequently reported related grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) are reversible leukocytes (29%), neutropenia (43%), platelets (35%) and lymphopenia (21%). 31 of 90 courses (34%) have been delayed for neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Anti-tumor activity to date includes a confirmed partial response lasting 15 weeks in a patient with osteosarcoma, and prolonged stable disease in 5 other pts with brain tumors (2), hepatoblastoma (2) and sarcoma (1). Conclusions: The modified FOLFOX6 regimen has significant but reversible myelosuppression in heavily pre-treated pediatric patients, but is tolerable and has promising activity in several tumor types. Cohort expansion continues at 100 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin. PET scan and pharmacokinetic analyses will be presented. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.485
Teacher spread0.417 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer Treatment and PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207