Assessing alternative dosing strategies for granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) use with FOLFOX6 therapy for treatment of colorectal cancer in a prospective cohort.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
771 Background: While clinical guidelines recommend an average of 11 injections of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) per cycle of chemotherapy, few studies support alternative dosing strategies for G-CSF use by cancer type and chemotherapy regimen. Methods: From 2004 to 2013, 63 colon and 47 rectal cancer patients were recruited and monitored throughout the course of their FOLFOX6 therapy. G-CSF use was determined by a clinical pharmacist and tracked every week to ensure patients received an adequate number of injections and were compliant with each cycle. All patients received at least two cycles of G-CSF. Occurrence of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were compared between patients receiving four and five injections per cycle. Results: There were 54 males and 56 females with a median age of 56. 104 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy with the remaining six being in the metastatic setting. 83 of 110 (75%) patients experienced no delays after initiation of G-CSF with 67 (61%) of those patients receiving four or five injections per cycle. The remaining 27 of 110 (25%) patients experienced a delay in treatment after at least one cycle of G-CSF completed (15 neutropenic delays, four FN delays, and 12 thrombocytopenic delays). Significantly, only seven of those 27 (26%) patients had a neutropenic delay that occurred as a result of a failed dosing strategy after G-CSF was initiated. Of these seven neutropenic delays, five (71%) were the result of a four dose injection pattern, but none were the result of the five dose injection pattern scheme. All other delays, after at least one cycle of G-CSF (74%), were caused by patients’ non-compliance The overall compliance rate with G-CSF injections was 93%. Conclusions: Only 7 of 110 (6.4%) patients experienced a G-CSF failure. It is recommended that G-CSF be administered on day 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 of each FOLFOX6 cycle to maintain absolute neutrophil counts and prevent treatment delays.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".