Phase I study of sorafenib in children with refractory solid tumors: A Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
10012 Background: Sorafenib, an oral multitargeted kinase inhibitor, is indicated for treatment of adults with refractory renal cell or hepatocelluar carcinoma. We performed a phase I trial to determine the toxicities, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of sorafenib in children with refractory solid tumors. Methods: Sorafenib was administered q12h for 28 consecutive day cycles. Cohorts of 3–12 patients were enrolled at 105, 130, 150, 200, and 250 mg/m2/dose dose levels. Results: 34 eligible pts [16M, median age 14.6 yrs, (range, 5–21)] with osteosarcoma (n = 8), rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 3), other sarcomas (n = 13), hepatoblastoma (n = 3), or other solid tumors (n = 7) received 1–22 cycles (median 2). Grade 3 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred in 4/6 pts at the starting dose (150 mg/m2) and included hypertension (n = 1), rash/urticaria (n = 1), back pain (n = 1), thrombocytopenia (n = 1) and ALT/AST (n = 1). No DLTs were observed at 105 (n = 6) or 130 (n = 3) mg/m2, and the dose was re-escalated to 150 mg/m2 with modified eligibility criteria (normal ALT) and revised guidelines for grading and management of hypertension. Gr 3 DLTs occurred in 1/6 pts (lipase) at 150 mg/m2 and 2/2 pts (hyponatremia, hand-foot syndrome) at 250 mg/m2. At 200 mg/m2 only 1/6 pts experienced DLT (gr 3 ALT). No objective responses were observed, but 2 pts had tumor shrinkage. Sorafenib AUC did not increase proportionally with dose - the mean AUC0–24h was similar at 150 mg/m2 (28±24 μg · h/mL, n = 9) and 200 mg/m2 (28±17 μg · h/mL, n = 4). Tmax was prolonged and variable (10±11 h, n = 19). Plasma VEGFR (n = 13) decreased from 9.9±1.6 ng/mL at baseline to 8.3±1.7 ng/mL by d 28 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The MTD of sorafenib in children with solid tumors is 200 mg/m2, similar to the adult recommended dose (400 mg). No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".