MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2248984556

The effects of Hip Abductor Fatigue on Low Back Pain Development during Prolonged Standing

2015· dissertation· en· W2248984556 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Daniel Viggiani

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationHip painMedicinePsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The goal of this thesis was to use hip abductor fatigue to perturb those who do and do not develop pain from standing and determine changes in muscular and postural responses.
\n\tForty young healthy participants performed two sessions of standing work for two hours each. Participants performed a side-lying leg raising exercise to fatigue prior to one of the standing sessions, the other session acted as a control. Surface electromyography (EMG) of six muscles bilaterally, motion capture of the trunk and lower limbs, and force plate data under each foot were measured continuously during each standing session. Self-reported pain and isometric hip abductor strength were assessed at discrete time points using 100 mm visual analog scales and uni-axial force transducers respectively. Participants were classified as pain developers (PDs) or non-pain developers (NPDs) based on a 10 mm threshold in low back pain scores during the control session.
\n\tPDs (16/40) reported decreases in low back pain while standing during the fatigue session (10.9 ± 11.7 mm reduction) while NPDs reported minimal changes in pain with fatigue (1.5 ± 3.9 mm increase). Decreases in trunk (1033.9 ± 528.6 %MVIC reduction in first hour) and gluteal cocontraction indices (398.8 ± 792.4 %MVIC decrease in the 15 minute block) and increases in the number of anterior-posterior centre of pressure fidgets (13.5 ± 25.4 increase in the 30 minute block) were observed in the first hour of the fatigue session in PDs. Female PDs had more posterior pelvic tilt with fatigue (3.9 ± 9.2° more posterior with fatigue from 30 to 90 minutes), distinguishing them from male PDs (7.0 ± 11.3° more anterior with fatigue from 15 to 120 minutes). Both pain groups had similar EMG frequency shifts and strength lost due to fatigue. NPDs had longer times to fatigue than PDs (NPDs: 20.1 ± 11.2 minutes; PDs: 18.7 ± 9.3 minutes; p = 0.0106). 
\n\tThis study provides evidence that the hip abductor musculature is likely one causative factor in the low back pain developed from standing. Also, PDs had fatiguing characteristics of persons suffering from chronic low back pain, only without any pain present.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score0.671

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFrench-language works237,207