MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2249678414

Flux of Multi-Year Ice Past the Molikpaq in the Beaufort Sea, 1985-86 Season

2009· article· en· W2249678414 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
R. Frederking, Denise Sudom

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceSea ice thicknessDrift iceArctic ice packAntarctic sea iceGeologySea ice concentrationClimatology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As part of the environmental monitoring program that supported drilling operations from the Molikpaq at the Amauligak I-65 location during the winter of 1985-86, information about the ice conditions and movements round the structure were collected on an hourly basis. These observations included ice thickness, ice type, partial concentrations, floe sizes and drift rate and direction. In this paper the data were used to assess the flux of ice passing a fixed location. Of particular interest was the amount of multi-year ice present and the relative exposure of the Molikpaq to multi-year ice interactions. In addition to the hourly ice observations, which were representative of a zone within a several km radius of the Molikpaq, detailed observations and video records of ice interactions with the structure were also made. Monthly Canadian Ice Service regional ice charts and drift buoys provided regional data. The various sources of ice data are compared to put the 1985-86 data into a broader context. The total flux of ice through the 2 km radius zone of observation was about 1000 km over the 240 day observation period, of which 30 km was multi-year ice. The flux of multi-year ice that actually interacted with the 100 m wide Molikpaq was about 10 km, the majority of which was second-year ice in November.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207