Influence of Iron on Respiration in Corn (Zea Mays) Seedlings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper the influence of iron in different concentrations of FeCl3 solution on the respiration of corn (Zea mays) seedlings was observed. The following variants were used: V1 – as control, V2 = 0.1%FeCl3, V3 = 0.5%FeCl3, V4= 1%FeCl3. The respiration intensity of the 4 variants was determined applying the confined atmosphere procedure (Boysen-Jensen). This is a method based on determining the quantity of produced CO2. In case of this procedure, the contact between vegetal material and atmosphere takes place in a closed recipient, in which CO2 - resulted from respiration – is fixed by a solution of Ba(OH)2. An increase of the respiration intensity was noted, proportional with the increase of the administered FeCl3 solution concentration. Iron ion enters in the structure of cytochromes, which are components of the respiratory chain. Its presence in the growing environment of the corn seedlings led to the respiration increase. The intensity increase quickly evolves with low concentrations of iron, for example the variant with a concentration of 0.1% salt of FeCl3, for which it increased with 184% compared to the control, as the increase intensifies at concentrations of 0.5% with 259%. We note that in the last case, when iron is in the highest concentration of 1%FeCl3, the increase is no more so heightened, as it is higher with only 128% versus the previous variant. Iron highly stimulates the respiration up to a certain concentration, it was remarked
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".