MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PEO Ceramic Coating on Mg-10%wt. Zn for Potential Biological Application

2015· article· en· W2250017674 on OpenAlexafffund
Jonathan Hu, Xueyuan Nie

Bibliographic record

VenueKey engineering materials · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WindsorWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCorrosionMaterials scienceCoatingSimulated body fluidMagnesiumPlasma electrolytic oxidationBiocompatibilityZincMetallurgyMagnesium alloyAlloyTribometerSubstrate (aquarium)ElectrolyteTribologyNuclear chemistryComposite materialScanning electron microscopeChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnesium-zinc (Mg-Zn) alloys are strong candidates as medical implant materials due to their good biocompatibility and relatively high strengths. To manipulate the degradation of Mg-Zn alloy in the human body, a plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) treatment was applied to Mg-10%wt. Zn in this study because it produces a coating that is non-harmful to the human body and the process is inexpensive and environmentally friendly. Potentiodynamic polarization corrosion tests, performed in a simulated body fluid (Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution) were applied to the coated and uncoated Mg-Zn samples. The results of the testing showed that the coated Mg-Zn exhibited higher corrosion resistance than the substrate. With the PEO coating thickness of 7.2 microns, the corrosion current density was reduced by 1.00 μA/cm2 from the uncoated Mg-Zn respectively, indicating a significant reduction in the degradation rate between pure Mg-Zn and coated Mg-Zn from 7.0 to 3.7 kg/year. A pin-on-disc tribometer was employed to measure the coefficient of friction (COF) for the coated and uncoated Mg-Zn samples, lubricated with and without Hanks’ solution. The measured COF of the coated sample was very low (averaging to be about 0.22 under the lubricated condition) and comparable to that of the substrate which exhibited an averaged COF of 0.13 under the lubricated condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKey engineering materialsSame topicMagnesium Alloys: Properties and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207